Acting Responsibly
With the right legal and ethical guardrails:
- protect your facility from liability risks,
- secure the approval of your works council team
- and build trust among staff and residents.
With the right legal and ethical guardrails:
When AI is used, highly sensitive care data meets novel technologies. Data protection is not an obstacle; it is the foundation for secure implementation.
To ensure that your AI project is legally and ethically sound, you need to consider three areas from the outset:
AI should support care staff – not replace the human relationship.
As a management team, answer four core ethical questions in advance:
Transparency: Do all parties involved (staff, residents and relatives) understand where and how AI is being used?
Human connection: Is there still enough time for human interaction despite the use of AI?
Protection of vulnerable groups: Are people with dementia or disabilities given protection?
Critical reflection: Is your team aware that AI models can make incorrect assumptions because of biased training data?
AI never takes on legal responsibility. Every critical decision must be reviewed and approved by a qualified nurse.
The use of AI changes roles and workflows. If staff fear surveillance or job losses, the project will fail.
Learn more in Step 5: Involving stakeholders.
Invest in your team, not just the software. Involve your team in the decision-making process from day one.
Clarify internally in advance: How do we deal with AI errors? When is AI used? What data are processed? Where are the limits of such a system?
Learn more in Step 2: The Importance of AI for Care.
Communicate transparently that responsibility always remains with people. This reduces uncertainty, acknowledges your team’s changing role with appreciation, and helps ensure acceptance in day-to-day work.
The EU AI Act regulates AI systems according to their risk potential. Strict requirements apply to care facilities because care data and health-related assessments have a direct impact on people.
| Risk class | Meaning in care | Examples | Facility obligations |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unacceptable |
Prohibited. Risk of violating fundamental rights. |
Manipulative systems that influence behaviour. |
Use is completely prohibited. |
|
High risk |
Makes decisions affecting health, safety or dignity. |
Fall-risk analyses, AI-assisted care-level assessment, robots. |
Strict risk assessment, transparency, human oversight. |
|
Limited risk |
AI systems with direct user interaction. |
Chatbots, AI voice assistants. |
Information obligation: users must be able to recognise that AI is being used. |
|
Minimal risk |
Administrative tools without a link to individuals. |
Logistics or staff scheduling tools. |
No special requirements. |
This podcast was generated with the help of AI. The content was developed by humans and reviewed for accuracy. (As of: 14 September 2026)
You can read the podcast in this summary.
If you would like to learn more about the EU AI Act, you can find helpful information and tools on this page from the Future of Life Institute.
If your AI application assesses health risks (e.g. fall or pressure-ulcer risk) or supports diagnoses, it is generally considered a medical device. Make sure the provider has a valid CE marking.
If your AI application performs medical functions, it must meet the MDR requirements – in addition to the requirements of the GDPR and the AI Act. This keeps the AI safe, legally compliant and beneficial to your residents.
Health data are among the special categories of personal data under Article 9 GDPR. Avoid uncontrolled data accumulation and involve your Data Protection Officer (DPO) from the outset.
If you do not have an internal Data Protection Officer, be sure to seek external support for this complex topic. The DPO can help you with all relevant points:
Ensure that a legally valid DPA with the software provider is in place.
Are data processed locally, in a national cloud, on EU servers or in a third country (e.g. the US)?
Mandatory for high-risk systems under Art. 35 GDPR. Your DPO can assist you.
Inform residents or their legal representatives in an understandable way and obtain any required consent.
Strictly adhere to data minimisation (Art. 5 GDPR) – process only data that are strictly necessary for the purpose.
Partner projects showed that the greatest delays are usually caused not by technology, but by a lack of legal coordination. The following table shows which institutions in Germany and Denmark are relevant in this context:
| Area | Germany | Denmark |
|---|---|---|
|
Legal basis |
Digital Healthcare Act (DVG), Digital Healthcare and Nursing Care Modernisation Act (DVPMG), Health Data Use Act (GDNG), as well as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)/Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG) |
Social Services Act (Serviceloven), Health Act (Sundhedsloven), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)/Danish Data Protection Act |
|
Data protection |
Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI) and state data protection authorities |
Danish Data Protection Agency (Datatilsynet) |
|
IT security |
Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) |
Danish Agency for Societal Security (Styrelsen for Samfundssikkerhed) |
|
Care |
Federal Ministry of Health (BMG); implementation by the federal states and long-term care insurance funds |
Ministry of Children, Seniors and Housing (Børne-, Ældre- og Boligministeriet); implementation by municipalities |
|
Digitalisation |
Federal Ministry for Digital Transformation and Government Modernisation (BMDS) |
Ministry of Digital Affairs (Digitaliseringsministeriet) |
Our German Danish exchange in the Care-AI research project quickly showed that although both countries are subject to the same European rules, care facilities handle artificial intelligence, data protection and legal requirements very differently.
In practice, open questions and areas of legal uncertainty continue to cause considerable uncertainty.
Where possible, therefore, make use of official regulatory sandboxes to test projects and initiatives in a legally secure environment.
Use this checklist to start Step 3:
Data Protection Officer (DPO) is involved from the planning phase.
Works council / employee representation is officially informed and involved.
Risk class under the EU AI Act has been determined.
DPA and, where applicable, the DPIA are fully documented.
Usage guidelines and clear review obligations for professionals are established. At least one qualified nurse must review every critical decision.
Training plan for the care training team has been developed.
Risk management has been established: prepare technical documentation and define responsibilities. There is a procedure for regular review and reassessment of risks, data protection requirements and legal obligations.
GDPR is complied with. Technical and organisational measures protect sensitive data.
You have clarified the legal and ethical framework for your facility.
Your project has legal safeguards in place.
The relevant bodies are involved.
Your team is prepared to use AI responsibly.
The legal framework is in place and the boundaries have been defined? Next, it’s time to select the right solutions: In Step 4: Concept Development, learn how to find suitable software partners, assess interfaces, and negotiate contracts with confidence.